Posted by & filed under Health & Disease, Soil Erosion & Contamination, Water Contaminaton & Loss.

Studies have already found Monsanto’s toxic herbicide Roundup in groundwater, in streams, and even in the rain and air of US agricultural areas. It’s been found in our blood and even crosses the placental barrier to enter our unborn fetuses. So are we surprised that a German university study has now found significant concentrations of Roundup’s main ingredient glyphosate in the urine of city dwellers?

Perhaps we should be surprised at the amount: all the samples had concentrations of glyphosate at 5 to 20 times the limit for drinking water.

Roundup is used on railway lines, urban pavements, and roadsides. It’s used to dry down grain crops before harvest. But the single greatest use of Roundup is on genetically engineered "Roundup Ready" crops — designed not to die when sprayed with the poison.

Wouldn’t it be good if we too were Roundup Ready, so we wouldn’t get sick or die due to the virtually omnipresent toxin? After all, studies now link it to birth defects, endocrine disruption, cancer, and abnormal sperm.

As Roundup is a best-selling product worldwide and there are massive profits hanging on its continued use, the new testing initiative has fallen prey to the usual attempts at disinformation, distortion, and intimidation. Note the excerpt from the story: "The address of the university labs, which did the research, the data and the evaluation of the research method is known to the editors. Because of significant pressure by agrochemical representatives and the fear that the work of the lab could be influenced, the complete analytical data will only be published in the course of this year."

Read the article.

Further Reading:

3 Responses to “Roundup in City-Dwellers’ Urine”

  1. Greg

    Warning everybody – every time I researching into GMOs and/or Round-up, almost 95% of the articles either come from Mr. Smith. Most of the time his article are poorly referenced, and I have found incidences where he is exaggerating. He does not have scientific training or a background that helps him evaluate the scientific studies he occasionally references.

    Just a plea to everybody to please check these things out yourself, using original source material if possible.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)