Posted by & filed under Alternatives to Political Systems, Economics, Society.

The Tea Parties didn’t arise spontaneously: they were boiled up by big business.

by George Monbiot: journalist, author, academic and environmental and political activist, United Kingdom

The Tea Party movement is remarkable in two respects. It is one of the biggest exercises in false consciousness the world has ever seen. And it is the biggest astroturf operation in history. These accomplishments are closely related.

An astroturf campaign is a fake grassroots movement: it purports to be a spontaneous uprising of concerned citizens, but in reality it is founded and funded by elite interests. Some astroturf campaigns have no grassroots component at all(1). Others catalyse and direct real mobilisations. The Tea Party movement belongs in the second category. It is mostly composed of passionate, well-meaning people who think they are fighting elite power, and who are unaware that they’ve been organised by the very interests they believe they are confronting. We now have powerful evidence that the movement was established and has been guided with the help of money from billionaires and big business. Much of this money, as well as much of the strategy and staffing, were provided by two brothers who run what they call “the biggest company you’ve never heard of.”(2)

Charles and David Koch own 84% of Koch Industries, which is the second-largest private company in the United States. It runs oil refineries, coal suppliers, chemical plants and logging firms. It turns over roughly $100bn a year, and the brothers are each worth $21bn(3). The company has had to pay tens of millions of dollars in fines and settlements for oil and chemical spills and other industrial accidents(4,5). The Kochs want to pay less tax, keep more profits and be restrained by less regulation. Their challenge has been to persuade the people harmed by this agenda that it’s good for them.

In July 2010, David Koch told New York magazine, “I’ve never been to a Tea Party event. No one representing the Tea Party has ever even approached me.”(6) But a new fascinating film, (Astro)Turf Wars, by Taki Oldham, tells a fuller story(7). Oldham infiltrated some of the movement’s key organising events, including the 2009 Defending the Dream summit, convened by a group called Americans for Prosperity. The film shows David Koch addressing the summit. “Five years ago,” he explains, “my brother Charles and I provided the funds to start Americans for Prosperity. It’s beyond my wildest dreams how AFP has grown into this enormous organisation.”

A convenor tells the crowd how AFP mobilised opposition to Barack Obama’s healthcare reforms. “We hit the button and we started doing the Twittering and Facebook and the phonecalls and the emails, and you turned up!” Then a series of AFP organisers tell Mr Koch how they have set up dozens of Tea Party events in their home states. He nods and beams from the podium like a chief executive receiving rosy reports from his regional sales directors. Afterwards, the delegates crowd into AFP workshops, where they are told how to run further Tea Party events(8).

Americans for Prosperity is one of several groups set up by the Kochs to promote their politics. We know their foundations have given it at least $5m(9), but few such records are in the public domain and the total could be much higher. It has toured the country organising rallies against healthcare reform and the Democrats’ attempts to tackle climate change. It provided the key organising tools which set the Tea Party movement running. The movement began when the CNBC reporter Rick Santelli called from the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange for a bankers’ revolt against the undeserving poor(10). (He proposed that the traders should hold a tea party to dump derivative securities in Lake Michigan to prevent Obama’s plan to “subsidise the losers”: by which he meant people whose mortgages had fallen into arrears). On the same day, Americans for Prosperity set up a Tea Party Facebook page and started organising Tea Party events(11).

Oldham’s film shows how AFP crafted the movement’s messages and drafted its talking points. The New Yorker magazine, in the course of a remarkable exposure of the Koch brothers’ funding networks, interviewed some of their former consultants(12). “The Koch brothers gave the money that founded [the Tea Party]”, one of them explained. “It’s like they put the seeds in the ground. Then the rainstorm comes, and the frogs come out of the mud – and they’re our candidates!” Another observed that the Kochs are smart. “This right-wing, redneck stuff works for them. They see this as a way to get things done without getting dirty themselves.”

The AFP is one of several groups established by the Koch brothers. They set up the Cato Institute, which was the first free market thinktank in the US. They also founded the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, which now fills the role once played by the economics department at Chicago University: as the originator of extreme neoliberal ideas(13,14). Fourteen of the 23 regulations that George W. Bush put on his hitlist were, according to the Wall Street Journal, first suggested by academics working at the Mercatus Center(15).

The Kochs have lavished money on more than 30 other advocacy groups, including the Heritage Foundation, the Manhattan Institute, the George C. Marshall Institute, the Reason Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute(16). These bodies have been instrumental in turning politicians away from environmental laws, social spending, taxing the rich and distributing wealth. They have shaped the widespread demand for small government. The Kochs ensure that their money works for them. “If we’re going to give a lot of money,” David Koch explained to a libertarian journalist, “we’ll make darn sure they spend it in a way that goes along with our intent. And if they make a wrong turn and start doing things we don’t agree with, we withdraw funding.”(17)

Most of these bodies call themselves “free market thinktanks”, but their trick, as (Astro)Turf Wars points out, is to conflate crony capitalism with free enterprise, and free enterprise with personal liberty. Between them they have constructed the philosophy which informs the Tea Party movement: its members mobilise for freedom, unaware that the freedom they demand is freedom for corporations to trample them into the dirt. The thinktanks the Kochs have funded devise the game and the rules by which it is played; Americans for Prosperity coaches and motivates the team.

Astroturfing is now taking off in the United Kingdom. Earlier this month Spinwatch showed how a fake grassroots group set up by health insurers helped shape the Tories’ NHS reforms(18). Billionaires and corporations are capturing the political process everywhere; anyone with an interest in democracy should be thinking about how to resist them. Nothing is real any more. Nothing is as it seems.

References:

  1. See, for example, the exposure of astroturfing in Chapter 2 of my book Heat: how to stop the planet burning, 2006.
  2. http://www.portfolio.com/executives/features/2008/10/15/Profile-of-Billionaire-David-Koch/index3.html
  3. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/13/tea-party-billionaire-koch-brothers
  4. http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/Global/usa/report/2010/3/koch-industries-secretly-fund.pdf
  5. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/30/100830fa_fact_mayer?currentPage=all
  6. http://nymag.com/news/features/67285/
  7. http://astroturfwars.org/
  8. http://astroturfwars.org/
  9. Greenpeace’s report on funding by the Koch brothers and their foundations shows that they spent $5m on AFP’s Hot Air tour alone. http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/Global/usa/report/2010/3/koch-industries-secretly-fund.pdf
  10. http://www.cnbc.com/id/29283701/Rick_Santelli_s_Shout_Heard_Round_the_World
  11. http://astroturfwars.org/
  12. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/30/100830fa_fact_mayer?currentPage=all
  13. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/30/100830fa_fact_mayer?currentPage=all
  14. http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/Global/usa/report/2010/3/koch-industries-secretly-fund.pdf
  15. http://mercatus.org/media_clipping/rule-breaker-washington-tiny-think-tank-wields-big-stick-regulation
  16. http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/Global/usa/report/2010/3/koch-industries-secretly-fund.pdf
  17. Interview with Brian Doherty, reported by The New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/30/100830fa_fact_mayer?currentPage=all
  18. http://www.spinwatch.org.uk/blogs-mainmenu-29/tamasin-cave-mainmenu-107/5391-private-health-lobby-out-in-force-at-tory-conference

7 Responses to “Toxic Brew”

  1. Øyvind Holmstad

    Thank you George for this article! Many of these poor and bewildered people look at themselves as conservative Christians, but I can ensure they have sold their soul to the Devil. How can I say this? Because my grandfather was a conservative Christian and his values were the opposite of the values of the Tea Party movement in every way. These people are doomed; they have turned their back on the values of their forefathers. The values of my grandfather.

    Reply
  2. bagginz

    A good article that shines light into the dark areas of the creeping forces of crony capitalism/fascism.

    Though I do think that Rick Santelli’s position has been completely mis-characterized.

    Santelli is for capitalism proper, and not crony capitalsm (privatizing profits and socializing the losses onto the taxpayer)

    He’s actually against bankster bailouts, (giving public money to banks) and FOR letting the banks and companies fail as well as the real estate speculators that made bets that didn’t pay off.(Joseph Schumpter’s so called “Creative Destruction.”)

    “Astroturfing” is a useful new term for me. Proper terms are essential for conceiving and defining. Once a phenomenon is defined, it can be then be easily identified and therefore resisted.

    Reply
  3. JBob

    Yeah… what? We get rid of our lawns and replace them with this “astro” turf? Is that a legume?

    Reply
  4. Joshua Choate

    George, Craig, you guys are misinformed. I am among the demographic refereed to as the tea party. I am also a Christian. I am also an advocate of permaculture and promote its concepts as contained in Bill Mollison’s text. I have found tremendous support and interest for permaculture here and suggest that some of the best allies you have in permaculture are the very people you are now casting in a negative light. You have much more in common with us than you know, that is, if you agree with what Mollison writes.

    I respect your opinions but am deeply disappointed to find them promoted here on permaculture.org.au. Please find a more appropriate venue to share them. Else how can I urge my friends to read this site and become interested in sustainable practices?

    I would be delighted to carry on a conversation with either of you privately if you wish to gain first hand information about the tea party movement or Christian right wingers, respectively.

    Regards from your fellow permaculturist,

    Joshua Choate

    Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)