<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exxon Still Funding Climate Denial Groups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://permaculture.org.au/2009/07/03/exxon-still-funding-climate-denial-groups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://permaculture.org.au/2009/07/03/exxon-still-funding-climate-denial-groups/</link>
	<description>Permaculture News, Commentary and Worldwide Projects.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 02:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fustian</title>
		<link>http://permaculture.org.au/2009/07/03/exxon-still-funding-climate-denial-groups/#comment-38683</link>
		<dc:creator>fustian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://permaculture.org.au/?p=1579#comment-38683</guid>
		<description>I mean, Exxon is really pushing that whole denier thing hard if they&#039;ve been able to shake loose a whole $125,000 from their billions in profits over that last few years.

What a huge commitment.

I guess it&#039;s that vast amount of money that makes it so staggering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean, Exxon is really pushing that whole denier thing hard if they&#8217;ve been able to shake loose a whole $125,000 from their billions in profits over that last few years.</p>
<p>What a huge commitment.</p>
<p>I guess it&#8217;s that vast amount of money that makes it so staggering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fustian</title>
		<link>http://permaculture.org.au/2009/07/03/exxon-still-funding-climate-denial-groups/#comment-38682</link>
		<dc:creator>fustian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://permaculture.org.au/?p=1579#comment-38682</guid>
		<description>By the way. 

When you look at the billions of dollars being spent on fraudulent warming &quot;research&quot;, you&#039;ve got a lot of nerve hanging this argument on that massive investment of $125,000 spread out over two conservative think tanks.

That&#039;s probably not enough to pay for a couple of interns.

Your average overfunded climate thief, I mean, &quot;researcher&quot; goes through that in Starbucks alone.

And, these are primarily conservative think tanks and not weather research organizations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way. </p>
<p>When you look at the billions of dollars being spent on fraudulent warming &#8220;research&#8221;, you&#8217;ve got a lot of nerve hanging this argument on that massive investment of $125,000 spread out over two conservative think tanks.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s probably not enough to pay for a couple of interns.</p>
<p>Your average overfunded climate thief, I mean, &#8220;researcher&#8221; goes through that in Starbucks alone.</p>
<p>And, these are primarily conservative think tanks and not weather research organizations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fustian</title>
		<link>http://permaculture.org.au/2009/07/03/exxon-still-funding-climate-denial-groups/#comment-38679</link>
		<dc:creator>fustian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://permaculture.org.au/?p=1579#comment-38679</guid>
		<description>My what a difference a few months makes. 

Looks like ExxonMobil has been supporting actual science while the warmists have been engaging in scientific fraud.

Oopsie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My what a difference a few months makes. </p>
<p>Looks like ExxonMobil has been supporting actual science while the warmists have been engaging in scientific fraud.</p>
<p>Oopsie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://permaculture.org.au/2009/07/03/exxon-still-funding-climate-denial-groups/#comment-34532</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://permaculture.org.au/?p=1579#comment-34532</guid>
		<description>Alright, let me try to answer the &quot;why&quot; question posed in the article. 

Let&#039;s say Hitler was still alive--would you want him to be supportive of your political stance or opposed to it? I am guessing most of us would prefer that Hitler be opposed to whatever thing it is we are trying to do. 

The same thing is true with the false left-right paradigm. The &quot;right&quot; (George W. Bush, Exxon Mobile) gives political support to the system by &quot;opposing&quot; the thing that the real powers that be want accomplished (ie. a carbon tax and increased governmental control over every aspect of our lives). Everyone knows Bush is a liar and a war criminal so by his &quot;opposition&quot; of climate legislation, it reinforces the idea that this is actually a good thing (because evil Bush and evil Exxon are against it). 

Keep in mind that Al Gore owns controlling shares in an oil company. This is a gang of rich people raping the rest of us, and you and I, my friends, are not in that gang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, let me try to answer the &#8220;why&#8221; question posed in the article. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say Hitler was still alive&#8211;would you want him to be supportive of your political stance or opposed to it? I am guessing most of us would prefer that Hitler be opposed to whatever thing it is we are trying to do. </p>
<p>The same thing is true with the false left-right paradigm. The &#8220;right&#8221; (George W. Bush, Exxon Mobile) gives political support to the system by &#8220;opposing&#8221; the thing that the real powers that be want accomplished (ie. a carbon tax and increased governmental control over every aspect of our lives). Everyone knows Bush is a liar and a war criminal so by his &#8220;opposition&#8221; of climate legislation, it reinforces the idea that this is actually a good thing (because evil Bush and evil Exxon are against it). </p>
<p>Keep in mind that Al Gore owns controlling shares in an oil company. This is a gang of rich people raping the rest of us, and you and I, my friends, are not in that gang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Luetkemeyer</title>
		<link>http://permaculture.org.au/2009/07/03/exxon-still-funding-climate-denial-groups/#comment-34385</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Luetkemeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://permaculture.org.au/?p=1579#comment-34385</guid>
		<description>There a few points I would like to point out.  The term conspiracy theorists applies to anyone that believes in something which has not been proven to be accurate.  I personally call anyone that discussess climate change on both sides conspiracy theorists simply because there is an argument to most points on both sides.  

Second, I would like to point out what the writers says conspiracy theorists have never pointed out. The reason why governments are propagating mis-information about climate change is so they can put in place multiple taxes.  It is stated these taxes will be paid directly to a world bank.  This gives the globalists more control over the people. All taxes have ever done throughout history is enslave those being taxed.  Here in the U.S., they are in the process of passing a climate bill that does nothing to directly target the many problems we face.  It is nothing more than a giant tax bill.  To further answer the question of why Exxon has paid lobbyists.  This is nothing more than a front to bring more attention to the political side of the issue.  The banks throughout history have always funded both sides of the major wars.  They also fund both sides of these political issues.  Al Gore, the so-called leader of the global climate crisis, is the majority owner of a major oil company.  He also owns a company that clears land for developments.  He owns multiple homes, vehicles, etc that require a lot of energy to maintain.  These people that are suppose to be leading the way to a greener tomorrow need to lead by example.

Third, Bush excused the climate change issue because he had to put on a front for the Republican party in the U.S.  This is now becoming an issue because our Congress is controlled by democrats.  We are under very tyrannical measures here in the U.S. and it is about to get worse.  This is not by accident, but by design by a group of powerful world bankers who care not about money anymore but about control.  Anyone who wants to spend some time researching can find all the facts they need to back this up.

I will write more comments later; however, you have to first open your mind for debate before you can learn which side is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There a few points I would like to point out.  The term conspiracy theorists applies to anyone that believes in something which has not been proven to be accurate.  I personally call anyone that discussess climate change on both sides conspiracy theorists simply because there is an argument to most points on both sides.  </p>
<p>Second, I would like to point out what the writers says conspiracy theorists have never pointed out. The reason why governments are propagating mis-information about climate change is so they can put in place multiple taxes.  It is stated these taxes will be paid directly to a world bank.  This gives the globalists more control over the people. All taxes have ever done throughout history is enslave those being taxed.  Here in the U.S., they are in the process of passing a climate bill that does nothing to directly target the many problems we face.  It is nothing more than a giant tax bill.  To further answer the question of why Exxon has paid lobbyists.  This is nothing more than a front to bring more attention to the political side of the issue.  The banks throughout history have always funded both sides of the major wars.  They also fund both sides of these political issues.  Al Gore, the so-called leader of the global climate crisis, is the majority owner of a major oil company.  He also owns a company that clears land for developments.  He owns multiple homes, vehicles, etc that require a lot of energy to maintain.  These people that are suppose to be leading the way to a greener tomorrow need to lead by example.</p>
<p>Third, Bush excused the climate change issue because he had to put on a front for the Republican party in the U.S.  This is now becoming an issue because our Congress is controlled by democrats.  We are under very tyrannical measures here in the U.S. and it is about to get worse.  This is not by accident, but by design by a group of powerful world bankers who care not about money anymore but about control.  Anyone who wants to spend some time researching can find all the facts they need to back this up.</p>
<p>I will write more comments later; however, you have to first open your mind for debate before you can learn which side is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

